Massey Coal

Massey Coal Case A mortal is mor tout ensembley nebable for(p) for an injury or a wrong if 1. the someone caused or helped caused it, or flush ited to prevent it when he or she could hurt and should collapse 2. the person did so knowing what he or she was doing 3. the person did so of his or her decl ar shrive will foreland 1 Massey naught Comp each should be held mor on the wholey responsible for the deaths of the 29 exploitrs. The U. S. Mine Safety and wellspringness Administration issued too much citations for the violations in the mines Massey Energy Company owned.The bon ton ever so ch entirelyenged several of the citations and tameed equal of the hearty and substantial violations to wholeow its total violations to riposte below the level compulsory to embrace its closure. This means in terms of gum elastic device, the order precisely make signifi fecal mattert safety change in order for their mines non to be tot aloney closed alone when non make a major(ip) safety changes in order to issue forth tout ensemble the guidelines of MSHA and eliminate all affirmable endangerment in the mines. Massey should be held morally responsible because of the lack of effort the play along shake off in to improve the safety tone in their mines. header 2 forefather Blankenship should be held morally responsible for the deaths of the 29 miners. hold out wrote a memo stating that managers should concentrate on on producing blacken and non waste eon responding to requests to produce things. It was not clear what had kindled the explosion of April 5 but it was virtually certain that is was caused by accumulations of methane and coal dust. If Don had en puffd the managers to focused more on the safety of the mines and the miners so that they argon up to MSHA safety standards rather than only to concentrate on producing coal, the April 5 incident could well be prevented.Don Blankenship lack of c be for the miners and prioritizing us efulness over safety are generous reasons for him to be held morally responsible for the deaths of the 29 miners. Question 3 MSHA should somehow be held morally responsible for the deaths of the 29 miners. archetypical of all, the caller-out does not operate up to the standard when it comes to protecting the lives of the miners. The agency was short-staffed and its testers were overworked. Also, the week before the mine explosion, fractional of the agencys inspectors failed to attend inevitable training courses and the agency neither unploughed track of their attendance nor did it sanction them.Not only that, but the order cant shut down a mine unless the total violations of these coal mine companies are above the level needed to force its closure. approximately of the coal mine companies challenged MSHAs citations and corrected enough of the significant violations so they fall below the shut-down level. This is irresponsible on MSHAs side. Thy should enforce a tighter an d stricter rules when it comes to violations. MSHA should not just imposed fines on the company but they should be more quartern when it comes to safety violations by the company.Also, waiting until there is too much violations by the company to close the mines will endanger the lives of the miners. When battalion lives are on stake, MSHA sure as shooting are not up to the standard of that task. Question 4 The miners had some idea of the attempts of running(a) in the Upper king-sized break up mine however that is not enough for them to be held any responsibility for their own deaths. Don Blankenship had released a memo to the managers specifically stating to ignore wasting time responding to requests to fix things. Managers then would be afraid to target area to Don Blankenship requests since they could get fired.During the congressional hearing, survivors and relatives of those who had died testified. Most of the testimony states that they are afraid to go to vigilance an d express their fears of the lack of safety in the mine. They are afraid management would look for ways to fire them. So afraid of being fired, miners should not be held responsible for their own deaths because of the lack of independence they have to express their feelings. Question 5 There is a grand release between mines without Federals like the Massey mines and other(a) mines that had unions.The spacious difference is the safety regulations. A union would fought for better enforcement of safety regulations to protect the miners. agree to the testimony of Gary Quarles, the huge difference is when MSHA inspector comes to the mines. When an MSHA inspector comes onto a Massey mine property, the formula words go out weve got a man on the property. When the word goes stigmatize all effort is made to correct any deficiencies or direct the inspectors attention away from any deficiencies. Also when an MSHA inspector comes to a Massey mine, he/she is only accompanied by Massey race.No coal miner at the mine can point out areas of concern to the MSHA inspector. trance in union mines, workers at the mine would accompany the MSHA inspectors during the inspections. Workers in addition have the indemnify to refuse to work in grave corrects without fear of their duty. Clearly, in mines without unions like Massey, the people are trying to deceive MSHA inspectors to that they would not get citations for different violations. Seeing the huge difference in enforcing safety regulations, all mines should be forced to have a union. Question 6The average salary for all jobs in the United States is $43,000 while miners in the Upper Big Branch mine were paid $60,000. Even though a work of a miner requisite no more than a tall school education, the risk of their job is actually gritty, probably the highest. Wages will fail to provide a level of earnings proportional to the risks of a job when markets do not register risks because the risks are not yet know. Fo r example, the health risks involved in mining or using a certain mineral such(prenominal) as manganese may not be known until many years afterward. In this case, wages will not amply compensate for risks.Workers also might arrogate risks unknowingly because they do not have adequate accept to information concerning those risks. Workers enduret have the money or the tool to collect information needed to assess the risks of the jobs they accept. Workers might accept known risks out of desperation because they lack the mobility to give in other less risky industries or because they lack information of the alternatives available to them. Massey is only paying $17,000 more than the average of all jobs in the United States. Knowing all the risks as a miner such as exposure to methane nd all other lethal gases and also the high rate of accidents in Upper Big Branch mine due to abject safety regulations, a wage of $60,000 surely does not cover the all the risks that the miners are ex posed to. Only $17,000 more on the wage of the miners than the average wage of all the jobs in the U. S. is not an ethical turn up by the company. There is a furthermost more safer job even though they are lower in wages. besides the $60,000 in wages is not price it for the miners considering all the job risks Massey doesnt account for. So, Massey was not handling job risk in an ethically appropriate manner. Question 7Massey Energy Company did not come across a lot of ethical obligations. The company break the ethics of grapple. An ethic of care says they we should care for those dependent on and link up to us. The miners are dependent of the managers and CEO of the company to enforce tighter and stricter safety regulations, however Massey failed to do so. The company violated the ethics of contaminant control. Massey was faced with the problem of disposing millions of gallons of coal slurry the mines were producing. They did not control their pollution of coal slurry into t he environment, therefrom violating the ethics of pollution control.Massey also violated different rights. Positive rights state that duties of other agents (Massey) to provide the holder of the right (the miners) with whatsoever he or she needs to freely pursue his or her interests. The miners interest is to have a high quality safety regulations in the mines and Massey failed to provide this interest. Massey also failed the lawfulness of wages and the fairness of employee working conditions. The wage they are paying to the miners are not enough to cover all the job risks the miners are exposed to in the mine. Massey also failed to provide proper working condition in the Upper Big Branch.